|
|
|
|
|
|
by vmihailenco
1676 days ago
|
|
|
Thanks for the answer - that all makes sense... "but" :) there is also some sense in NOT having to support different storages / plugins API and instead supporting more features that work out of the box. At least I hope so. I will try Grafana Tempo & Loki - thanks for reminding. It is just that all their products look the same like the "original" Grafana for metrics which TBH does not look especially ergonomic too... Somehow Jaeger still comes first when people talk about tracing. |
|
|
I humbly do not agree. There’s always going to be an edge case which your features aren’t going to support and having the ability to roll out a plugin is the fastest way to integrate. There are also features I may want to keep confidential/proprietary depending on who the client is. In some cases even the existence of a certain feature in a certain shape gives away what a client is doing.
I’m generally staying away from software without extensibility opportunities. These types of solutions almost always end up as part of a larger infrastructure so extensibility is important.