|
|
|
|
|
by pochekailov
1643 days ago
|
|
Unfortunately, I do not see how. As we all know, N_homeless = N_people - N_homes. Current regulations effectively forbid to build horrible ugly high-rises that can house 50,000 people in each. Currently, it is only profitable to build luxury houses that nobody can afford. However, the horrible ugly high-rise has the only one advantage: it is cheap, and everyone can afford it. Even a homeless guy that manage to found a crappy -paying job through his heroic effort. I only see one way to end homelessness: make housing 20x cheaper than it is now. And that would not be possible without cancelling all housing regulations. |
|
This is not even close to true. It’s regularly recognized that for many people, homelessness is rooted in disabilities, mental health issues, substance abuse issues, or other problems that hurt their ability to keep and maintain a home even if they had one.
It’s not at all a pure supply issue, although supply plays a big role in certain geographic areas. It’s a complex problem.
Keep in mind that even if you own a home, maintenance, utilities, and taxes are expensive.