[pa7x1]

Supersymmetry must be broken in some way. The way it's broken is just an accident of this universe, in much the same way the radius of the orbits of our Solar System cannot be derived from first principles but they are just an accident of the evolution of our galaxy.

This means that the masses at which supersymmetric particles are found cannot be predicted from first principles, although we can constrain the range based on other observations. Like the mass of the Higgs, for example, as supersymmetric particles should interact with it and if they were too light or too massive this would have consequences that we could see.

To summarize, we cannot get from first principles the masses at which the supersymmetric particles are found exactly, as this is just an accidental feature of our universe. We do have some bounds. The LHC is not enough to discard the entire range. ncmncm is talking his ass off.

[ncmncm]

> Supersymmetry must be broken in some way. The way it's broken is just an accident of this universe

This is religion, until we have evidence, or at least a research program to obtain evidence. We don't.

High-energy physics has abdicated science, and is training up a priesthood who will reliably echo String Church doctrine. Successfully, by evidence seen here.

Fortunately we still have solid-state, fluid, low-temperature, high-Rydberg, plasma, and other physicists to take up the mantle and religiously-disinclined students. There is still plenty of physical science to do. Apostates could join in.

[scotty79]

So is there an energy level that we could use to rule out any supersymmetry?