|
|
|
|
|
by ofTheFountain
1642 days ago
|
|
Yea as a biologists who's done some genetic research this isn't about wokeness (though I don't think that's necessarily bad anyway). Race is a cultural term, not scientific. No one doing this research thinks there's no difference in genetic makeup between groups, it's that how we use and thinK about the word race doesn't line up with those groups and differences. It's just not accurate for scientific publications, not just the cultural and historical baggage it has.
Like down anyone thing that white, black, or asian describe narrowly defined genetic groupings? |
|
Now for cops, or social workers, or everyday speech, race may be just the perfect term - morphology is important to their work, and will remain important. But geneticists are concerned with more than morphology, or appearance.
I don't believe there is a linguistic threat here to everyday speech, or a threat to how we refer to each others appearance. But in genetics, race as a scientific term is in need of improvement - and that is what the article is acknowledging.
I'm not sure I would impute a "woke" angle here.