Look, if people are just saying NFTs are a human psychology hack to get people to donate more money to artists, then that's fine, but call a spade a spade. Don't blow smoke up my ass about how it's a game changing revolutionary technology that does things that simply can't be done without it.
That’s fine, but in many cases people believe these are investment instruments rather than seeing them as a donation. If these purveyors made it clear these were Donations, then yeah, that’s okay.
Maybe Wikipedia can sell NFYs to “articles” and avoid the donation button?
I think it’s pretty clear there’s a market for them, which attracted a bunch of knobs. But yes I see them as a direct way to fund artist’s work, particularly digital artists, who before this had to content with likes on Instagram! An NFT is a way to say “hey I like this so much I’ll pay you to keep doing it”