[aphistic]

When the Bible, God, and the Devil are overwhelmingly backed by science, give me a call.

[candiodari]

How are LGBTQ relationships overwhelmingly backed by science? It's a societal choice to allow or disallow them, and what the consequences are, no?

[klyrs]

I'm not sure what you're trying to prove with this but it sounds like flamebait; please don't do that here.

[aphistic]

The example is a false equivalency, it's comparing teaching religion to teaching science.

[vorpalhex]

Christianity exposes a binary: those who are not for me are against me.

CRT theorists propose the same binary: those who are not pro-CRT support racism.

It is possible to be against both racism and CRT.

CRT is not scientific. It is ahistorical, based on storytelling and disagrees with basic fundamental statistics. It is a religion with followers and evangelists, demons and devils. It even has a salvation arc, original sin and the "sins of the father" as concepts. Blood guilt is not science.