|
|
|
|
|
by Terry_Roll
1640 days ago
|
|
I don't know whether the problem is the law or not. Interesting to see some people have seen GDPR as a security risk, but its a great way for people to see what is being used to help an entity carry out its function. I sent this to my politician and am still waiting for a response but I'm more than interested in what they use tech wise, and I think it covers everything!?! GDPR Request:
Everything you have on me, please highlight what you or your 3rd party's consider to be for law enforcement purposes or for scientific purposes and therefore can not deleted, and please detail all & any 3rd party's who may be required to handle my data that enable you to perform your function of MP when dealing with me. Examples will include Anti Spam and Anti Virus software vendor(s), system's backup companies, cloud infrastructure provider's, network infrastructure provider's, computer equipment provider's, external national or regional department's, private assistant's or secretaries, mobile phone company's, data analytics' company's that have (in)directly identified me in order for you to get into office. This list of examples is not exhaustive.
After I have received & reviewed the data, I will inform you of what can be deleted. |
|