|
|
|
|
|
|
by xboxnolifes
1640 days ago
|
|
|
> My point is if your redundancy is better than AWS then why pay for them ? If it not they why invest in your own? This is a really confusing question. Redundancy requires more than 1 option. It's not about it being better than AWS, it's that in order to have it you need something besides just AWS. AWS may provide redundant drives, but they don't provide a redundant AWS. AWS can protect against many things, but it cannot protect against AWS being unavailable. |
|
|