Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by fivea 1639 days ago
> I'm not sure if we should say "AWS is down" if only us-east-1 is down.

The thing is, us-east-1 represents the whole AWS for the majority of us.

1 comments

Can you expand on that? What feature do you use in east 1 that isn’t everywhere else that it’s your whole implementation?
> Can you expand on that? What feature do you use in east 1 that isn’t everywhere else that it’s your whole implementation?

Your question reads as a strawman. It matters nothing if EC2 is also available in Mumbai or Hong Kong if by default the whole world deploys everything and anything to us-east-1, and us-east-1 alone.

https://www.reddit.com/r/aws/comments/nztxa5/why_useast1_reg...

It's not a strawman. There's a huge difference between "AWS is down" and "customers don't know how to use AWS". For the people who use AWS correctly, they only had some degraded service, not downtime.
> It's not a strawman. There's a huge difference between "AWS is down" and "customers don't know how to use AWS".

Deploying a service to a single region is not, nor has it ever been, "customers don't know how to use AWS".

If anything, cargo culting this belief in global deployments being necessary, specially with services that have at most a regional demand, is a telltale sign a customer has no idea about what he is doing and is just mindlessly wasting money and engineering effort in something no one needs.

This blend of bad cargo cult advice sounds like a variant of microservices everywhere.

There many AWS services which have only global endpoints and not specific to geo, all of these are hosted on us-east-1 .