|
|
|
|
|
by timr
1638 days ago
|
|
This is completely incorrect. As the sibling comment notes, antibody titer against a pseudovirus (synthetic virus containing spike protein; what this figure shows) is a proxy for immunity, and nobody has ever shown that it bears any practical significance at all. Antibody levels go down over time. If they didn't, your blood would be peanut butter. Antibody levels for absolute neutralization of a synthetic virus in a dish? I have no idea what that means. It's something people look at because it's easy to look at in a dish. In contrast, a recent paper from JHU and the NIH shows that people who were previously infected have T-Cell responses to spike protein that are almost completely unaffected by mutations in Omicron: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.06.471446v1 In short, there's excellent data showing that long-term immunity to Omicron is robust after exposure to prior strains. |
|
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/12/21/us-omicron-...