|
|
|
|
|
by pydry
1645 days ago
|
|
If I am not in the house or I am asleep it is a waste of energy to heat it. I find it weird that you get indignant at the idea of a little more automation than a timer. >How do you think thermostats worked before the internet? Either wasting money heating an empty home when I went out or I came home to a cold house and then turned on the heating. I remember. I also remember thermostats which didnt understand the concept of weekends, etc. |
|
I agree, which is why I use a multi-stage programmable thermostat. Once again, it turns off when I leave, turns back on a bit before I get home, lets it warm/cool a bit while I sleep, and then starts back up around when I wake up.
> I find it weird that you get indignant at the idea of a little more automation than a timer.
If you're manually telling it you're on your way home that sounds like less automation to me. Personally I'd take the tiny bit of efficiency hit having it heat the house maybe an hour or two off from my regular schedule than having to micro-manage turning my thermostat on and off on a more expensive device that will probably be eventually bricked.
I'm just saying, the vast majority of the quality of life improvement from your internet connected thermostat could have been achieved with just a 7-day 4-stage programmable thermostat that has existed for 20 years. Its nice you're happy with your expensive device that's beholden to some cloud server, I hope it stays online for a few more years.