|
|
|
|
|
by siliconc0w
1646 days ago
|
|
Lots of re-orgs is also a pretty big indicator. A lot of VPs/directors need a reason to exist and they create that reason with reorganizations. This is basically the enterprise equivalent of pushing the food around the plate to make it seem eaten. With a re-org you can shed or minimize expensive to operate systems that don't generate a lot of clear value(i.e most tech-debt). |
|
If you had asked me, I'd probably say that tech debt is mostly systems that do generate value but are built poorly or in a rushed manner. Deadlines creep up, devs crunch, they ship a "working" product but it has design flaws that manifest as technical debt.
But now that I think of it, I've definitely also experienced what you're mentioning (I think). I've worked on projects with questionable motives that ultimately end up cancelled or abandoned. The leftover code remains and continues to confuse newcomers.