| Nothing causes no harm. Water causes harm. You need to demonstrate that the advantages are worth the harm. > Before injecting a substantial quantity And as I quoted, the stated view is that the amount of thiomersal was NOT a "substantial quantity." > It reasonably leads one to think that you are pulling a fast one Which is why PR efforts to throw shade on the US voting system - despite evidence to the contrary - gets transformed into false belief that the US voting system is corrupt to the core. Which is why PR efforts to cast doubt on the negative effects of smoking, and on the negative effects on profligate fossil fuel consumption, are effective. But that doesn't actually mean someone's pulling a fast one, only that people are trying to convince you that someone's pulling a fast one. > The fault for that is on people like you. You must also do your part and not make easily dismissed exaggerations, or omit important qualifiers, as else your entire point will be easily dismissed. |