[lotsofpulp]

Where is the structural problem?

Total time from high school to nurse can be as low as 16 months, plus however long to get government paperwork.

https://bestaccreditedcolleges.org/articles/how-long-does-it...

A case can be made for doctors who have limited residency spots effectively capping new yearly supply, but what possible argument could there be for nurses other than nurse pay is not high enough to attract more people to nursing?

People changing bedpans get paid $10 to $15 per hour in many states, who wants to do that unless they have zero other options?

[maxerickson]

The number of people accepted is too small.

Hundreds of people applying for dozens of slots. The trainers that are training are not well compensated.

[lotsofpulp]

How do you know the people not accepted would have made desirable nurses? Surely one would want some minimum standard for the people poking you with needles and administering your healthcare/medicines.

> The trainers that are training are not well compensated.

This is just another insufficient pay scenario.

[maxerickson]

I don't know it, but I sort of take it as a given that the marginal rejectees are going to be roughly as capable as the marginal acceptees. It's not really an aggressive assumption.

And it isn't just an insufficient pay scenario. Hospitals just pass on the high cost of nursing to patients instead of subsidizing training programs. Patients don't see the supply as part of the cost problem and don't demand that more money be devoted to education.

[lotsofpulp]

Yes, the feedback mechanisms get quite complicated because 80%+ of people cannot not afford the level of healthcare that they receive.

But the root of the problem remains the disparity in people’s expectations of the services they will receive with the amount those service providers are getting paid.