|
|
|
|
|
by Grinnz
1642 days ago
|
|
> That it would be maintained is all that really mattered to me, and there's no doubt in my mind that it would be. Nor mine, but because I know that Perl 7 would die as most of the maintainers stayed working on Perl 5. Or the worst case: too many leave Perl entirely to maintain either fork. Perhaps some corporations would take up the funding, but it is not a simple piece of software you can throw new developers at and expect progress; it's an enormous C program built on thousands of macros and decades of history, as anyone who has tried writing XS code probably sees in their nightmares. > As soon as you make breaking changes, I am referring specifically to doing it without breaking changes, as is the current plan, and the only option at this juncture. |
|