Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by subbz 1647 days ago
Everybody: Avoid Google Chrome for the sake of privacy.

Google is doing everything to track even if you opt-out. And they will continue to implement their workarounds.

Quick solution: Use Firefox.

Stop throwing data at Google. Google is evil (Google "don't be evil" for more info on that).

6 comments

Every single hacker here should switch to Firefox. If not for how much better it is (IMO it is), purely for the sake of common good.

Firefox team also needs a bit of spanking - WTF are you doing with this product? The PMs and the leadership of Firefox is fucking things up. We just want a goddamn browser. Stop changing the UI. Stop with all this other bullshit. No one is asking for it. I really don't want a future Firefox-AI assistant. The way things are going, the probability of this is pretty high.

> Google is evil (Google "don't be evil" for more info on that).

Or better....

Use Ecosia.org, Startpage.com, or Qwant.com to search for

"Google is Not What It Seems"

Permanent solution: Move to the EU and enforce your rights under GDPR. :)
Being objectively less secure is not a solution.

Use Chromium. Use Vanadium.

Why is using Firefox less secure?
I just glimpsed over it, but that sounds actually not good.

I would suppose the advantage of FF is the way smaller marketshare, along with technical competence of at least some of its user making it not such a attractive target, compared to chrome.

PartitionMalloc?

Doesn’t PM becomes unsecured from ASLR option being enabled?

Something about CPU NUMA and the generalized malloc’s Arena architecture?

Is Firefox really a solution anymore? Recent news about Firefox implementing [Manifest V3](https://9to5google.com/2021/05/28/firefox-manifest-v3-extens...) with "Manifest V3" appearing to be another attempt from Google to kneecap privacy extensions. I've been considering Brave which I had pretty much ignored but I honestly don't know who to trust. I think it's basically common knowledge we can't trust either Google Chrome or Microsoft Edge.
Firefox is implementing Manifest V3 but not the part designed to hinder content blockers.
Thank you, your comment helped me realize I was misinterpreting the article.
The answer to your concern is even in the headline of the article you link!
If only. Even just the headline makes it clear that Firefox has no leverage and are capitulating. Plus, that was just one example.
After seeing tjpnz's comment and re-reading and reading the linked Mozilla announcement I was misinterpreting the article. I thought the article was just saying that they would continue to support Manifest v2 while adopting Google's Manifest v3 and then was saying Manifest v2 was going to be retired around a year later. However, the Mozilla announcement makes it clearer that they are implementing a fork of Google's Manifest v3.
So Firefox not doing the thing that kneecaps adblockers is evidence of Firefox not being a solution? how does that work?
Yesterday I tried to buy an from Google's Play Store for an Android tablet, on which I had installed an account with minimal information. Not wanting to hand out my credit card number to them, I bought one of those cards with prepaid credit. And guess what you need to fill in to redeem the card: your address and phone number. Why would that be needed? The answer: it isn't needed, but they want it, and they've got you by your balls. This is such awful abuse of their position.

And yes, I filled in a fake address, and then was not able to redeem the card. They need "more details", and the process can take several weeks. Google is evil in every pore.