|
|
|
|
|
by JonathonW
1650 days ago
|
|
The further the battery and switch get away from the light, the less current you'll see at the battery at (sqrt(2)*width)/c s, since the electric and magnetic fields around the battery and wire will drop in strength as you move further away from them. Put another way, the main reason this effect is observable in the way shown in the video is because the light and battery, and the wires between them, are so close together. Move them further away, and, per the inverse square law, you'll start seeing a much lower induced current-- the effect may still be there, but it won't be measurable over the noise floor of the experiment setup. |
|
What's happening is that you are straying further and further from the "impedance matched" condition (the inductance per unit length stays the same but the capacitance goes up with the separation--however, being "too close" will also cause similar behavior). Consequently, the energy transmitted per reflection gets smaller and smaller.
Part of the problem in this whole discussion is using a "light" as a "threshold detector" where the threshold is effectively microamps. A microamp threshold detector is not what people think of as a "lamp".
If the original Veritasium video had showed the current flow via meter, oscilloscope, etc. nobody would be terribly surprised as it would show small flows getting bigger upon each reflection until it built up to the full current.