|
|
|
|
|
by fault1
1647 days ago
|
|
yeah, but your claim was "Note also that Julia would be number 1 in almost all of those benchmarks if you were to rank by speed of second run" notice this isn't even a language vs language benchmark. it's libraries and frameworks. plus I don't think even the author of the julia library in question would agree with your statement: https://discourse.julialang.org/t/the-state-of-dataframes-jl... as mentioned in that thread, GC and strings, or especially a combination of the two, can be very much a downer in terms of julia performance. That's actually pretty surprising since strings are often as important if not more important than numbers for a lot of data processing needs. I'd also say in terms of compilation time, some autocaching layer outside of precompilation would do wonders. |
|