|
|
|
|
|
|
by vineyardmike
1648 days ago
|
|
|
> The court disagreed that Neo4j granted a naked trademark license, pointing out that the open source licenses granted to third-parties on the open source software repository were copyright licenses, not trademark licenses. Users of the open source version of the software did not have any right to use the Neo4j trademark without a separate trademark agreement. Naked licensing does not occur where there is no trademark license. Neo4j used GPL by the way. https://www.finnegan.com/en/insights/articles/open-source-so... |
|
|