[tester34]

Imma clarify:

By "normal" here I meant that you don't have to be some kind of genius in order to model real world using OOP.

And we have shitton of programmers that everyday model real world complexities using OOP

>Wasn't that whole concept just marketing by Sun to sell Java and OOP to the world? These days everyone using Java uses so much spring and xml I'm not sure it even makes sense to call it OOP anymore. It's more like AOP+DI with a little OOP thrown in.

Well, on the other hand C# doesn't have all of that XML fetish/Annotation Oriented Programming (@Transactional :P)/Aspect Oriented Programming magic, so it's not like there's only one interpretation and implementation of OOP and it must be Java's