|
|
|
|
|
|
by andrekandre
1647 days ago
|
|
|
> that being said there is nothing to discuss about meritocracy, yet i agree with the fact that things are not that meritocratic as we want them to be. why? because there is always an asymmetry in a market, and contracts may always have some flaws (for e.g.: lemon market).
i guess that can be one issue, but my experience has been that what usually undermines "meritocracy" is basically office/org politics... |
|
|