[nescioquid]

I apologize for responding to myself, but I want to point out that I don't know the specific laws that may govern whatever account under which Pelosi's husband is executing trades. As I understand it, all property between spouses (in Minnesota, at least) is considered implicitly as "joint tenants in common" between spouses, but this may not be the case in California.

If all property in California is considered joint tenants in common between spouses, then this gives the lie (not mere equivocation) to the statement that "...the speaker does not own any stocks".

Can anyone shed light on this matter?