[necovek]

It's more of a question how other tools need to be configured to get a similar CPU utilization, and what RPS would they hit in that case?

I'd create a VM that you can load sufficiently well with FastWSGI, but other tools might need more worker threads or worker processes added to put the same load on that VM.

Basically, what matters practically is what's the maximum you can pull out of this hardware (whatever the configuration is)? Those are then really comparable.

[james_roberts]

Thanks for the advice! I'll try this out

[necovek]

Ideally, it turns out that all those other tools load the same hardware just the same, but they simply suck compared to FastWSGI.

Then we can all get collectively excited :)