[jack_pp]

It seems it is rare : https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/reinfe... .

Also found a recent CDC study on this : https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7032e1.htm?s_cid=mm... .

However, from said study : "First, reinfection was not confirmed through whole genome sequencing, which would be necessary to definitively prove that the reinfection was caused from a distinct virus relative to the first infection. Although in some cases the repeat positive test could be indicative of prolonged viral shedding or failure to clear the initial viral infection (9), given the time between initial and subsequent positive molecular tests among participants in this study, reinfection is the most likely explanation"

Do with this as you will, but it seems there's nothing concrete. "most likely explanation" isn't good enough to force people to get an emergency use, rushed vaccine.

[sjg007]

Reinfection has been well established all over the place. You can identify it via PCR, you don't need to sequence it.

[jack_pp]

PCR has false positives. Also I came with sources, you didn't provide any.

[sjg007]

If you can’t research the scientific literature effectively, that’s on you.

[jack_pp]

No, it is on you to provide proof for your assertions. It is not my job to verify your claims.

[sjg007]

You are parroting debunked arguments from 2 years ago.

[jack_pp]

You are wrong. There, isn't that a stupid argument?

If you are going to just state your opinions as fact without actually providing evidence for extraordinary claims then this conversation is pointless.