[roywiggins]

Paying more attention to information in a peer-reviewed journal than information in a pseudonymous substack is not "cult-like faith." Of course the study could be wrong.

[defaultprimate]

The study is not and has not passed peer review.

[roywiggins]

Hasn't it? Looks published to me. It has a doi and everything.

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abi9069

[defaultprimate]

My mistake, the link in the article you first posted still shows it as a working paper and I couldn't find it with the original title when searching.

Interestingly the DOI does not show up

https://dx.doi.org/

Here's some further criticisms:

https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-1073440/latest.pdf

https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.01296

https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s...