| > Why can't tape be self-contained like HDDs? Because that gets rid of the main advantage of tape. Which is that the tape-media has no read/write head and is therefore much much much cheaper to mass produce. --------- In practice, people buy tape-libraries entirely. Like a 3U unit with 50-tape slots + a few drives to read/write to those tapes, and then hook them up to the network. https://www.quantum.com/en/products/tape-storage/ From this perspective, you buy as many tapes as you want storage (aiming for 500TB? Buy like 40 LTO7 tapes for your library. Aiming for 1000TB? Buy 80 LTO7 tapes for your library, assuming compression of course). From there, you just read/write to the library, and have the underlying software handle the details, like any other NAS. |
I don't know why this seems the standard practice in the industry, but it really annoyed me when I realized a “15TB” LTO-7 tape has actually only 6TB real, “native” storage coz it assumes some average compression ratio.
Why is this acceptable? What if I use the tape to store incompressible data like video and images? Feels like intentional cheating.