|
|
|
|
|
by kkjjkgjjgg
1653 days ago
|
|
I have read it. Their argument about groups making many advances is rather weak, though. It only links to a list of 100 allegedly most important advancements in human history.
If you need a good brain surgeon, a group and its advancements won't help you much. You need somebody with a very good education.
I also don't assume there is a strict hierarchy of capabilities.
You can still do your group advancements while Yale exists.
The article simply does not make a very good argument. |
|