[actually_a_dog]

Just to be clear, if by "normal," you're referring to the way humans existed for 95% of their existence, which was as small bands of hunter gatherers, that very clearly implies an advanced state of collapse. Even if some of the worst case scenarios for collapse come true, that's a long ways off. For one thing, it would probably imply a significantly reduced population (probably no more than 10-20% of current population levels) before nomadic hunter gatherer groups becomes an efficient way to live.

[esarbe]

That was just an observation with regards to what we "modern" humans consider to be "normal", not a comment on how far down the next collapse will bring us.

(Not to mention that we probably have neither the abilities nor the ecosystem to revert to hunter-gatherer subsistence.)

No, I don't expect a collapse back to the stone-age in the short run. But to every human living in "modern" conditions, a reversion back 100 or even 200 years in terms of comfort and luxury will be quite staggering.

The wake up call will be a very harsh one, nonetheless.