|
|
|
|
|
by pureliquidhw
1656 days ago
|
|
That's basically replacing regular currency buying a service. The earlier comparison was to commodities and crypto's difficult to value nature. I won't argue you can't buy goods and services with crypto. You certainly can't produce plastic without oil, but there's nothing that can be made with crypto. It's not a commodity. That's why it's a speculative asset that's hard to value. Sentiment means more to crypto values than downstream values. In this particular example, if a competitor offered data sharing and shared compute services 100x cheaper than the eth network, I don't think eth value would go down anything close to 100x. If I found a way to turn air into plastic and gas, you can bet oil prices would plunge. If Musk said crypto is dead, prices would plummet. |
|
In this way, native crypto tokens like Eth are similar to petroleum, in that their value is commensurate with the value of the work that can be performed by consuming them.
Sure, competition between networks can have an impact on price, just like competition from electric vehicles can impact the price of oil. But competition does not itself destroy value, even if it has an impact on demand, and therefore on price.
The article itself talks about the difference between value and price. The price of crypto might be inflated by the hype surrounding it, but that does not mean that is has no underlying value, as you seem to assert.