| > Dear god man, NO. Those may be legal - and who wrote those laws? But they sure as fuck aren't fine, morally and ethically speaking, unless you're a fucking sociopath. Which billionaires are more likely to be. Then you and I simply have different morals. I don't consider anyone trying to minimize their taxes in a legal way to be immoral. > Didn't Amazon get in trouble recently for interfering with a union vote? Which is one company whose CEO is not a billionaire... > That's a bad assumption, and there are mountains of research out there on the topic. It's stunning that you can't seem to look for any yourself, because if you looked you would find it. I admit I didn't search for any research. I assumed you would have it since you are so certain billionaires are fundamentally different from non wealthy humans. > That's a very, very lazy take. That's really the best you could come up with? Leeches and victim blaming? It's lazy to assume something you read about that is in a book that is > 100 years old to be true. And I'm not victim blaming. Who even is the victim here? I'm simply stating that it is always easy to blame something outside of yourself. Blame shifting has been a well researched area in psychology for decades. > https://www.vox.com/2015/6/16/8790357/rich-people-jerks > Read the above link. Look into the sources it cites. > There are huge differences, and it's not even remotely in doubt. Your whole assumption is so far off base it's not even funny; just sad. While the article is garbage the cited sources are interesting and on a cursory glance do seem to show that wealthy people are more antisocial compared to average people. At least in America. I wonder if this is the same for other cultures. Anyway I don't really care to continue this discussion with you since you are obviously not in the right state of mind to approach this subject without heavy emotion. |