[technobabbler]

> I think the issue is that even if Mozilla did do that, to achieve the same level of configurability for privacy and security, in ways that the user.js and all it's options offer, or with the many objections they've had to new standards, they would end up needing to fork Chromium to a point where it might become debatable whether the effort was worth it in the first place.

Yeah. That's basically what happened with Blink/Webkit. But that chasm is narrower than Gecko/anything, since at least they share a common heritage. And with Chromium, we already have Chromium/Brave/Opera/Edge/Samsung/Silk/Vivaldi/etc., all of which have fewer problems than the entirely separate Gecko, to say nothing of SpiderMonkey vs V8 & Node.

A browser is more than just the renderer, as those alternatives have shown. The world might need an underdog nonprofit browser, but it doesn't need an alternative renderer.