[crad]

pipx is a solution without a problem. pip worked well. setuptools was fine. pypa is breaking packaging by making it more complex and less usable IMO.

pip + setuptools using setup.cfg works very well.

It seems to me the Python packaging community is chasing the nodejs community for very little value and a lot more added complexity and very little regard to the community and package maintainers in general.

[zohch]

> pipx is a solution without a problem

It is a solution to the problem of: how do I run something without having to install it into my user environment and having to worry if it conflicts with package versions used by other things in my user environment. I often use it for simple code demos, share a pipx command to run code from some github repo I made to show how something can be done in python.

And it does not require any special consideration from package maintainers.

[crad]

Which was already a solved problem.

[Too]

Technically yes, UX-wise no.

Nobody wants to fiddle with python -m venv + source bin/activate manually just to install and use a command line utility.

That said, you could probably reinvent pipx with 10 lines of shell-script and get 90% of it's utility.