[hooande]

lol. a rough translation is that the new super language models are good enough that you don't have to keep track of specific parts of speech in your programming. if you look at the arrays of floating point weights that underlie gpt-3 etc, you can use them to match present participle phrases with other present participle phrases and so forth

this is of course a correct and prescient observation. minimaxir is kind of an NLP final boss, so I wouldn't expect most people to be able to follow everything he says

[minimaxir]

I don't think it's more of a final boss thing: IMO working with embeddings/word vectors is easier, even in the basest case such as word2vec/GloVe, to understand than some of the more conventional NLP techniques (e.g. bag of words/TF-IDF).

The spaCy tutorials in the submission also have a section on word vectors.

[Vetch]

Ah, although, TF-IDF is still good to know. Semantic search hasn't eliminated the need for classical retrieval techniques. It can also be used to select a subset of words to use to create an average of word vectors for a document signature, a quick and dirty method for document embeddings.

Bag of word co-occurrences in matrix format is also a nice to know, factorizing such matrices were the original vector space model for distributional semantics and provide historical context for GloVe and the like.

[mumblemumble]

> Bag of word co-occurrences in matrix format is also a nice to know, factorizing such matrices were the original vector space model for distributional semantics and provide historical context for GloVe and the like.

And also, IIRC, still outperforms them on some tasks.

[vfulco2]

Thank you for making it easier for those in the cheap seats to understand your point!