[anamax]

We're not going to see eye-to-eye because you think that other folks should work for free to make Microsoft products more secure.

I think that when security problems in Microsoft products are Microsoft's responsibility and no one else's. By insisting that other people work for free to improve that security, you're arguing that other people are responsible for said security problems.

That's a curious position. You think that someone who isn't paid is responsible, but not Microsoft, who is paid.

I understand why Microsoft would like that arrangement, but why do think that anything else is wrong?