| Spot on - this annoys me so much. So much, from quantum til cosmos, so much in life is not boolen / black or white. "Oh, someone got sick though he was vaccinated, vaccinations don't work"
"Oh, someone got sick, and didn't die, it must not be serious"
"Oh, its is not an exponential curve, it is sigmodial... "
"Oh but now 50% on the ICUs are still vaccinated??"
"Oh, but vaccinated, transmission is still possible?!" So many strawman and itself maybe right statements, but wrong conclusions drawn. I would hope we could educate ourselves better, it is not just booleans, it is also not just relative percentages, it is never simple. It is also always about absolute numbers, it is also about probability theory, it is even more about also conditional probability (that seems so counterintuitive to many) .. etc. etc. But people stick to argue with single observations or boolean statements as the gound truth so many places :( It is like children argueing "Yes it is" "No it isnt". To come back to what you said: Yes after all we know right now: The probability of transmission is reduced on multiple levels: your virus load is smaller, your infectious time is shorter, maybe more |