|
|
|
|
|
by hackbinary
1657 days ago
|
|
I don't thing that is true. The client obtains the network prefix from the RA, and then the client tries to generate unique host address. ""
The IPv6 stateless autoconfiguration mechanism requires no manual
configuration of hosts, minimal (if any) configuration of routers,
and no additional servers. The stateless mechanism allows a host to
generate its own addresses using a combination of locally available
information and information advertised by routers. Routers advertise
prefixes that identify the subnet(s) associated with a link, while
hosts generate an "interface identifier" that uniquely identifies an
interface on a subnet. An address is formed by combining the two.
In the absence of routers, a host can only generate link-local
addresses. However, link-local addresses are sufficient for allowing
communication among nodes attached to the same link.
"" https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4862 |
|
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7421 is helpful in understanding this.
Basically it explains that SLAAC RFC itself does not define the /64 limitation, but other RFCs that are relevant to network operation do.
""" The addressing architecture [RFC4291] [RFC7136] sets the IID length at 64 bits for all unicast addresses and therefore for all media supporting SLAAC. An immediate effect of fixing the IID length at 64 bits is, of course, that it fixes the subnet prefix length also at 64 bits, regardless of the aggregate prefix assigned to the site concerned, which in accordance with [RFC6177] should be /56 or shorter. """