|
|
|
|
|
by francoisp
1653 days ago
|
|
I'd love to know why the author (I've seen that elsewhere as well) would aim at not writing some plpgsql? Is it for the "tour-de-force" bragging rights? I've found that a plgpsql routine can be so much more efficient and faster to devise; especially with good use of triggers. Executing schema-related logic in "ring-0" is way faster and the transaction guarantees integrity? Isnt guaranteed integrity with some logic "vagrant-ish"? :-) BTW awesome products Hashicorp, way to go! |
|