[ckastner]

This is hilarious. So Craig Wright, in his continuing claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto (yet still refusing to prove it trivially), has -- naturally -- also claimed to own all of the Bitcoin that only Satoshi Nakamoto could have mined.

Somebody claimed half of that and lost. But $100m worth of intellectual property rights were awarded to some venture, meaning that Wright might owe someone a great deal of money now.

Well, according to the article, "Wright said he would prove his ownership if he were to win at trial", so I guess that will be finally settled soon.

[GBiT]

$100 m was awarded to "W&K Info Defense" and its interesting, that 75% stocks owns he and his ex-Wife. Only 25% was Dave Kleiman and whose are disputed in separate lawsuit. So basically Craig Wright have to pay to himself.

[tinus_hn]

So what is the basis used by the other party to claim half of the coins? And what’s the reason it wasn’t awarded?