Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by qw 1651 days ago
The shoemakers also repaired and maintained shoes. They would replace soles, repair holes etc.
1 comments

That's an argument for needing fewer people, not more - since it happens in situations where it's less labour-intensive to repair shoes than to make them from scratch.
Not necessarily. If the materials are expensive, paying somebody to repair a shoe can be the cheaper option.

I think people still repaired socks after knitting them was automated for that reason.

The first automated knitting machine was from 1589. Queen Elizabeth I denied its inventor a patent “because of her concern for the employment security of the kingdom's many hand knitters whose livelihood might be threatened by such mechanization” (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Lee_(inventor))

Edit: maybe not. https://www.historylink.org/File/5721 learned me that gear for us soldiers in World War One was knitted manually. Maybe, those machines weren’t used (much) yet by then?

Isn't the main reason that making from scratch is less labour-intensive than repairing because of mass production?

With medieval production methods, I would bet that making from scratch is significantly more labour-intensive than repairing.