[lottin]

Shareholders can't be asked to police the company. That's not their job. They don't have the resources nor the expertise to do it.

[pid-1]

Shareholders literally own the company. Not making them accountable for their companies actions is prob the worse incentive system ever.

[ClumsyPilot]

No no, it's bad to ask questions of the management team, we call those "Activist investors"

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Activist_shareholder

The sibling comments have an interesting worldview: can't fine management cause it's not their firm, can't fine shareholders cause it's not their fault, its nobody's fault.

[totalZero]

Holders of common stock are not involved in the daily operations of the company. Not all ownership involves that level of liability. This is by design.

[lottin]

Apparently you didn't think very hard about that one. If you made the owner of a company criminally liable for any wrong-doing by the company's employees, nobody would risk owning a company. It would be impossible to have an advanced economy with these conditions.

[genewitch]

I'm for the idea of no one wanting to own a company, who do I vote for?

[gokdisjtrdcvv5]

I don’t think that’s what they said

[selfhoster11]

So they can push for ever greater profits, but not bear any responsibility?

[netcan]

No, but if fines are the mechanism for punishment/restitution, they may as well be marked to market cap.

[dtech]

They don't need to police it, they need to give the board etc. the proper incentives to do business legally because they will be hurt financially if the business doesn't. The policing is still done by the government agencies.

[carnitine]

All you need is a few activist hedge funds to do the policing. You can’t blanket say that shareholders lack resources.