|
|
|
|
|
|
by pinerd3
1652 days ago
|
|
|
This is clever, but I wouldn't call it a variation on this style of proof — the OP was an example of a somewhat-subtle logic error, while this is just two instances of wordplay (forelegs ⇔ four legs; six legs being an 'odd' number of legs for a horse). The joke is funny though |
|
|