|
|
|
|
|
|
by ashtonbaker
1652 days ago
|
|
|
You should read “n” as “some arbitrary n” in the quote you posted. It’s not an assumption for all n. edit: sorry, you’re right that the wording is a bit sloppy. The “n” in the first quote is “for all n” and the n in the second quote is “some specific n” or “some arbitrary n”. They’re not meant to be the same statement. I don’t think it’s a very carefully written article. |
|
|