|
|
|
|
|
by throwaway248329
1655 days ago
|
|
>If it "makes sense to you" that the lack of Gold Standard is the real reason workers are poor, it probably helps to consider that workers were much poorer for the vast majority of human history with a Gold Standard... That doesn't tell much. Anyone was much poorer for the vast majority of human history. How do you explain the wealth inequality trend change starting from 1971? https://wtfhappenedin1971.com/ |
|
But obviously the people who advocated the tax cuts for the rich in the 1980s are highly, highly motivated to pretend it was leaving Gold Standard several years earlier that did it. Not least because going back to a gold standard would allow them to make that gap even bigger - the 1% could HODL the 30% their wealth in risk free, liquid, appreciating coins instead of having to take actual risks and create actual jobs. But the deflation that preserves their wealth as they withdraw from funding productive activity is - quite literally - everyone else's wages and sales revenues going down.