With a spouse that works in palliative medicine, I really wish the author had chosen a different phrase. Please don’t get the idea that palliative care is only for the dying. Everything else about the article is spot on.
It’s quite offensive, as somebody who nearly died from sepsis (a couple of months ago), like the drug user in the article, but for different reasons. In my case it was from an infected portacath, that was carelessly flushed during routine maintenance and care.
Also, I cost more, on a per year basis, than the individual in the article, as I require an orphan drug and will for the rest of my life.
I am American but fortunately live abroad so I don’t have to put up with people writing BS narratives and stories that “link” arbitrary statistics together, which people with economics backgrounds tend to do. All in all, this is clickbait.
The solution to the “problem” in the article is houses, regardless of drug usage status.
And yes, it's actually very, very easy to do incredible amounts of damage to a place without much action. Don't clean it and leave trash rotting everywhere and cause an insect and vermin infestation. Throw literal shit on the walls, leave a clogged faucet on and forget about it and cause a lot of water damage everywhere along with a very bad mold problem, punch the walls in anger and leave huge holes in the drywall and broken windows. Rip off cabinet doors and use it as firewood because it's 'free firewood'. Fixing damage from bad behavior like that crosses into 6 figures very quickly.
And if your actively angry, you can do shit like pour concrete down the toliet and faucets and more.
These people need active management in a long term mental health facility, not just housing. The +%90 of invisible homeless that don't have a serious mental illness, brain damage and crippling drug addictions yes can be helped by housing. Most 'invisible' homeless people in that category get out within a year or two. I think what everyone is referencing when they are talking about homeless is the chronic visible ones yelling at a random tree.
Sorry, I wasn't aware of that. I was under the impression that palliative care is (at least generally) end-of-life comfort for the dying. I wish I had chosen a more appropriate term.
It’s ok, not the first time someone has gotten that impression about palliative care. It’s something that my spouse has to constantly reinforce with her patients and their families. Thanks for sharing the article. The point you’re making is important.
I to tought that it was a branch of medicine dedicated to the relief of the suffering of those who are afflicted with a disease that will eventually kill them. But clearly you indicate that it's more than that so I would like to know.
Her elevator speech definition: Palliative care is a whole person approach to medicine for patients with a terminal diagnosis who are still undergoing active treatment.
FWIW definitions like that didn't help me understand what palliative care means in practice or what it would have done for me as a caregiver, apart from its well-defined subset of hospice. People kept asking me if I had considered "palliative care", but could never define what it was. I don't think that was just a polite way of saying hospice - it was a distinct group at the same VNA. It didn't help that this palliative team I tried talking to was small and there was some administrative weirdness. In the end it didn't matter for me - full on hospice was definitively appropriate, and they did their job very well. But in the interests of helping others in a similar situation, more concrete explanations of the mechanics would help!
Also, I cost more, on a per year basis, than the individual in the article, as I require an orphan drug and will for the rest of my life.
I am American but fortunately live abroad so I don’t have to put up with people writing BS narratives and stories that “link” arbitrary statistics together, which people with economics backgrounds tend to do. All in all, this is clickbait.
The solution to the “problem” in the article is houses, regardless of drug usage status.