|
|
|
|
|
by slg
1653 days ago
|
|
> I get that Privacy is obligated to gather certain financial information for regulatory purposes and fraud prevention, but it feels like I'm widening my attack surface providing that info. This feels like a "you always become what you once hated" situation. Privacy.com was supposed to keep our private data private. With this change there is no way to use Privacy.com without providing even more private data. This really should have been a choice for users. Do you want privacy or better compatibility? Considering Privacy.com's userbase and their freaking name, I would guess many users would choose privacy over that extra functionality. |
|
With modern fraud prevention and financial regulation, we simply cannot expect actual privacy with payments or really any finance.