[anramon]

So, saying that vaccination should be primarily and aggressively focused on people with comorbilities can be "misinformation" but saying that booster jabs "massively" strengthen bodys's defense against covid is completely accuarate and acceptable.

I think we are really getting into a point of no return here, i'm actually seriously worried about all this.

[rsynnott]

> So, saying that vaccination should be primarily and aggressively focused on people with comorbilities can be "misinformation"

Eh? That's not misinformation and has been the policy of most governments, more or less. Now, it would be misinformation to suggest that it doesn't need to be given to anyone else.

> but saying that booster jabs "massively" strengthen bodys's defense against covid is completely accuarate and acceptable.

That is what the studies say (obviously, 'massively' is editorialisation).

I'm not sure what your point is, here?

[impendingchange]

Perhaps that editorializing seems to push a narrative, when the Lancet study doesn't contain the word "massively" at all.

To quote the single-sentence summary of the study, "All study vaccines boosted antibody and neutralising responses after ChAd/ChAd initial course and all except one after BNT/BNT, with no safety concerns", flies in the face of what most people anecdotally know with regards to vaccine safety, which could be interpreted as "pushing a narrative".

https://openvaers.com/