| >> especially if it's doing so for irrational reasons or out of spite > I think assuming that it's out of "spite" is an example of not realizing how "your side" might be causing the division. With "out of spite," I was specifically referring to things like "owning the libs." > There are a lot of people who have already had covid and now have antibodies, who were also never in, and continue not to be in, a risky demographic. The risk for these people is very, very low already. So? Getting a vaccine isn't only about managing personal risk. Also, from what I understand natural immunity is often weaker than vaccine-induced immunity, and "hybrid immunity" (natural + vaccine) is superior to either alone. > On top of that, the vaccine is not entirely without risk. There have been many reports of side effects, specifically heart issues in young males. There have been some deaths. Is that risk higher than that from COVID infection? No: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg25133462-800-myocardi.... This is a good example of an irrational reason: I'm scared of a choice that has a very small chance of producing myocarditis, so instead I'll make a choice that has a greater chance of producing myocarditis. |
This isn't true.
"Healthy boys may be more likely to be admitted to hospital with a rare side-effect of the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid vaccine that causes inflammation of the heart than with Covid itself, US researchers claim."
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/sep/10/boys-more-at-r...