[sam0x17]

Right, but society has accelerated. 50 and 100 year precedents used to make sense. Now it seems like they need to be updated at least every 10 years, because that's how long it takes for society to fundamentally change at the current rate of progress.

Regarding government, if you don't like your current government, then if you think hard about it, what you really want is either 1) additional regulations or restructurings that prevent the government from having the bad traits it currently has, or 2) the removal of existing regulations that are preventing the government from being better in your eyes.

If your statement is "I don't like the current state of the government" then you are simply for transforming it into something you do like. This can be done through a regulatory framework.

If you don't trust the government as it is, then you are one more voter for regulating X, Y and Z such that you do trust the government.

[SuoDuanDao]

There is also a cultural element though. The laws and regulations may encourage corrupt behaviour, but if there was a strong cultural expectation that the most upstanding people go into government to serve their communities - and if that were actually who was attracted to the role - that wouldn't matter all that much.

[visarga]

Voting is a blunt tool. It destroys too much nuance and freedom of choice.

[sam0x17]

Agreed. We should revise that process through new regulations and modifications to the existing system.