|
|
|
|
|
by jdavis703
1660 days ago
|
|
> Also the pre-pandemic norm was not to wear a mask, so according to you mask mandates definitionally cannot "work". The idea is we wear a mask for a temporary amount of time, eliminate community spread, and eliminate masks. Countries outside of North America have done this. For example, the UK is just now requiring theater goers to wear a mask again. |
|
The trouble is, managing R is an ongoing challenge. If you manage to get it below 1 and the rate of new infections decays to nearly nothing, great! But unless you completely shut the borders to prevent new seed infections, you have to keep doing whatever you were doing. If you relax, then R goes above 1, and exponential growth does its thing again and you're back where you started. There's a natural ceiling to the exponential growth - nobody quite knows why, though it's presumably something to do with acquired immunity - but it's a grim place to be.
I wouldn't look to the UK as an example of how to manage a pandemic. It has been bouncing along its infection ceiling ever since all measures were relaxed in July. I predict that the new mask mandates will have no detectable effect on infection rates; their modest effect on R will fail to bring it below 1, and rates will continue to "bounce along the top".