[jhgb]

> it takes longer to learn the basics of Rust compared to C++.

Does it really? For example I'd think that initialization of objects is a topic that should be in "basics", yet initialization of objects in C++ seems disproportionately complex compared to Rust (at least to me).

[ncmncm]

Yet, object initialization is not a thing anyone needs to pay much attention to. Yes, there are historical rabbit holes, but you need not go down them.

[jhgb]

> object initialization is not a thing anyone needs to pay much attention to

So it's perfectly fine for me to leave objects uninitialized because of lack of attention?

[ncmncm]

It's perfectly fine to initialize them in the simplest and most obvious way.